Menu

Results from Experiments conducted at LNEC during 2016

Objectives

  • Damage, runup and overtopping characterization under variable and unsteady test conditions of a rubble mound breakwater section
  • Approach: Physical model tests of a breakwater section
    • 2D damage, runup and overtopping tests for a rock armour slope
    • 2D runup and overtopping tests with an impermeable smooth (pespex) slope

Methodology

  • Methodology:
    • Section of:
      • a rock armour 1:2 slope
      • a 1:2 impermeable slope structure


        Figure 1. LNEC’s wave flume


        Figure 2. Model setup


        Figure 3: Breakwatercrosssection
    • Establish of variable test condition
      • 2D damage, runup and overtopping tests for a rock armour slope
      • A - Standard cumulative storm build-up (wave height increases) with increasing water level
      • B - Standard cumulative storm build-up with constant water level
      • C - Constant wave period (instead of constant steepness)
      • D - Standard storm build-up, constant water level, rebuilding
      • D* - Standard cumulative storm build-up (wave height increases) with varying water level
      • 2D runup and overtopping tests with an impermeable slope
      • E - Scaled HR Wallingford conditions

        Table 1. Test conditions
    • Test and measurements
      • Free surface elevation (with wave gauges)
      • Run-up (with wave gauge and video)
      • Wave Overtopping - both mean and wave-by-wave – (with load cell and wave gauges
      • Damage evolution (visual and using photogrammetry)
    • Analysis of results

  • Temporal analysis of the free surface elevation



  • Spectral analysis of the free surface elevation



  • Free surface elevation: Results: Hs – Tests 1 – 7



  • Free surface elevation: Repetitions HS



  • Run-up



  • Overtopping

Next steps

  • Spectral analysis of the free surface elevation measurements using wavelet transform to evaluate the variation of Tp and spectral density energy throughout the entire test
  • Wave run-up measurements using video image analysis
  • Damage progression assessment using the damage average calculated for all the surveyed profiles and using the total eroded volume of the surveyed envelope.
  • Damage progression assessment using the dimensionless damage depth parameter (E)
 

 Back